biggest-gaudiest-patronuses:

aphony-cree:

sp8b8:

class-isnt-the-only-oppression:

biggest-gaudiest-patronuses:

biggest-gaudiest-patronuses:

Happy Pride Month Eleanor Roosevelt was queer, the Little Mermaid is a gay love story, James Dean liked men, Emily Dickinson was a lesbian, Nikola Tesla was asexual, Freddie Mercury was bisexual & British Indian, and black trans women pioneered the gay rights movement.

Florence Nightingale was a lesbian, Leonardo da Vinci was gay, Michelangelo too, Jane Austen liked women, Hatshepsut was not cisgender, and Alexander the Great was a power bottom

Honestly just reblogging for that last one

Probably not historically backed but fuck yes

Eleanor Roosevelt wrote love letters to Lorena Hickok

Love letters Hans Christian Anderson wrote to Edvard Collin contain elements that appeared in The Little Mermaid, which he was writing at the same time

Several people who knew James Dean have talked about his relationships with men 

Letters and poems allude to a romance between Emily Dickinson and at least two women 

Nikola Tesla was adverse to touch. He said he fell in love with one women but never touched her and didn’t want to get married 

Freddie Mercury is well known for his attraction to men but was also linked to several women, including Barbara Valentin whom he lived with shortly before he died. Friends have talked about being invited into their bed and walking in on them having sex (documentary Freddie Mercury: The Great Pretender) 

Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera are two of the best-known activists who fought in the Stonewall riots

Florence Nightingale refused 4 marriage proposals and her letters and memoir suggest a love for women 

Leonardo da Vinci never married or fathered children, was once brought up on sodomy charges, and a sketch in one of his notebooks is 2 penises walking toward a hole labeled with the nickname of his apprentice 

Condivi said that Michelangelo often spoke exclusively of masculine love

Jane Austin never married and wrote about sharing a bed with women (Jane Austen At Home: A Biography by Lucy Worsley)

Hatshepsut took the male title Pharaoh (instead of Queen Regent) and is depicted in art from the time the same way a male Pharaoh would have been

“Alexander was only defeated once…and that was by Hephaestion’s thighs.” is a 2,000 year old quote

I want to hire you to follow me around and defend my honor with meticulous research

sturgeonworld:

Jack Rackham is just so iconic he starts out as literally the worst pirate in history, he loses several hundred dollars worth of pearls, assists in the (absolutely justified) murders for his entire crew and gets pissed on and ends up the one of the only members of the cast still on the account having sailed along side the most famous pirate in history as his equal and he does this through… Idek a combination of stubbornness, iconic dialouge and the fact that his lesbian gf is rlly good at stabbing stuff

i rate fox emojis

jaganshiis:

a solid fox. good rendering. looks soft. 9/10

an adorable stylized boy!! i’d give him my wallet. 11/10

a simple boy, bold lines. but lacks personality. 6/10

she is adorable and well-groomed. i love her. 10/10

this thing ravished my trash can and stole my first born. 4/10

a tiny boy! hes shaped like a friend. 9.5/10

she is round and kind. i trust her. 10/10

a distinct style, though he too lacks any depth. 7/10

he is kind. but something behind is eyes is hiding something. 8/10

darkness consumes me. 0/10

pirateshelly:

I feel like there’s a really interesting parallel between the Anne/Eleanor teaming up to kill Max’s rapists in season 1 and James murdering Alfred Hamilton. There are a few lines in relation to those two situations that draw explicit parallels, but the differences in the way they’re presented to the audience is such a fascinating example of the way this show deals with the truth of a story versus the way a story is perceived and presented to the world.

In season 1 the audience is privy to Anne and Eleanor’s motivations and there’s no question that we’re supposed to be fully on their side even though they’re murdering 8 dudes. And from a place of knowing the why of it and knowing it was a sort of “righteous killing” we then see the way their actions to defend max are twisted in order to vilify both of them. Eleanor is turned into a tyrant and an evil queen who will murder anyone who “offends” her pride. And Anne becomes the monster and madwoman shunned by every crew on the island..

But with James and the Maria Aleyne we don’t know the story. We only know how it’s perceived, we only see the outside version of story where he’s a villain. But then we move in closer and learn the truth and retroactively realize what kind of story this has been right from the start and it’s just SO GOOD.

It’s the whole unraveling of the concept of queercoded villains this show does and it’s just amazing

annevbonny:

“Black Sails is crafted a bit differently than any other show I’ve seen. The pacing more closely resembles that to a well-written novel than it does to any modern TV show. Because of that; it takes time. Time for the plot to unfold, time for the characters to reveal themselves to you, and time for you to settle in just before everything you expected gets subverted… …Is television supposed to pick us up and carry us away, or is it something we should work to engage in? There are different standards between what makes a good show and a good novel, but should there always be? Strong literary works ask us to engage with the material and hold it up against a light to analyse it. But TV rarely encourages that same kind of depth of thought. As entertaining as Game of Thrones is, there’s few who would agree that it could withstand the same amount of analysis as Wuthering Heights or Moby Dick. Black Sails on the other hand gets richer the further down you dig.”

Why ‘Black Sails’ has made me question everything I know about good TV

This article is what had me thinking about modern television’s obsession with plot over themes the other day. I think the writer, Brook Wentz, is spot on when she compares Black Sails to a novel, both with regards to pacing and to its ability to hold up to in-depth analysis. 

I think modern audiences need to open up to a more diverse assortment of show formats—slower pacing, plots that require longterm investment, experimental structures, postmodern components, etc. If we’re going to start calling television “art,” after decades of dismissing it as inconsequential pap, shouldn’t we hold it to the same standards we hold other art forms?

If all novels were written in roughly the same style, with the same restrictions and structures, and if writers who diverged from that style were shut out or ignored, the medium would stagnate and die. Who’s to say the same won’t happen to television if we don’t loosen up our standards?

(via whatagrump)

rosietwiggs:

sometimes i think about how they filmed thomas and james’s love story in season two and i’m just sort of overhwlemed by the narrative and cinematic choices because like

compared to every other relationship on the show, it like – filtered it through this dreamy and lovely haze, all focused on smiles, and comfort, and morning afters, and okay, part of that is probably the fact that it’s being looked back on through the lense of James’s memory

but part of it is that the narrative was holding up thomas and james’s relationship as this ideal – in a world where they both would have hanged for being together, THEIRS is the relationship that is depicted as this pure and almost holy love, their relationship was sacred, and true anD I GET REALLY EMOTIONAL ABOUT IT HELP

originalhufflepuff:

edwardsgay:

if I was a vampire on the run from the volturi I would just. hide at the bottom of the fuckin ocean. the ocean is huge. who’s gonna look there? Demetri would look for me and he’d just see darkness and some plankton. like where is this bitch? idk u figure it out u old hoe. I’m somewhere in the fuck you region. good luck scouring the ocean floor, 80% of this planets surface, u dipshit. I drink the blood of the scary creatures down there. I’m chillin. check mate bitch

#everything about this is a masterpiece including the url

spikedbat:

glumshoe:

One of my favorite tropes is “Villain Decay”. It’s not a redemption or reformation – the character themself doesn’t necessarily change morally or behaviorally, but the as the stakes become higher and more serious antagonists are introduced, the original villain seems harmless and friendly in comparison.

that’s how you end up in an elevator with your adopted emo god of mischief brother trying to convince him to stop being mildly evil for five minutes so you can defeat your mega evil older sister who is destroying your home planet